
Hello everyone! 🙂
Welcome to ‘Bradley’s Basement’ blog and I’m Tim Bradley!
(sighs) ‘An Unearthly Child’ is the very first ‘Doctor Who’ story in the classic TV series and it’s by a writer named Anthony Coburn. In October 2023, the BBC announced that ‘An Unearthly Child’ wouldn’t be released on BBC iPlayer alongside other ‘Doctor Who’ stories on November the 1st, 2023. 😦
This is due to a copyright dispute between the BBC and Anthony Coburn’s son, Stef Coburn, who has claimed he withdrew the licensing rights for the BBC to repeat ‘An Unearthly Child’ following disagreements over compensation for his father. At the time of this blog post, the debate is ongoing.
Now these details aren’t really relevant to ‘An Unearthly Child’ and its production back in 1963, since this is something that’s recently occurred in today’s media. Therefore, I’ve not mentioned it in other blog posts until now nor have I updated it in reviews like ‘An Unearthly Child’ to establish these points.
However, in connection to the latest BBC Four repeat of ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’, which I’ll get into more shortly, if I don’t raise these issues now in connection to ‘An Unearthly Child’ – the story that began ‘Doctor Who’ in the first place – I’m likely to be asked why I didn’t mention it at all.
The thing is, I prefer to talk about pleasant stuff, such as storytelling and character development. I try my best not to talk about anything that’s unpleasant or politically topical in ‘Doctor Who’ unless I really have to. It’s why I’ve not brought up recent controversies on celebrities e.g., John Barrowman.
If I have to mention something that’s tragic or horrible, it’s only brought up because it’s important to know for the TV show. This includes Roger Delgado’s tragic death during Jon Pertwee’s era, and the fall-out between producer John Nathan-Turner and script editor Eric Saward during the mid-1980s. 😐
I can’t guarantee this is a policy I’ll always abide by, but hopefully I’ll do my best when moving forward in terms of checking out new ‘Doctor Who’ content as well as backwards when it comes to updating already-posted ‘Doctor Who’ reviews, including possibly updating my ‘An Unearthly Child’ review. 🙂
I don’t know if the ongoing dispute between the BBC and Anthony Coburn’s son will be resolved and whether we’ll get to have Season 1 of the classic ‘Doctor Who’ TV series released on Blu-ray. I hope I will get to update my Season 1 ‘Doctor Who’ reviews with or without the season being on Blu-ray.
We’ll have to wait and see. It’s a shame this has happened since I’ve enjoyed the very first ‘Doctor Who’ story with William Hartnell, William Russell, Jacqueline Hill and Carole Ann Ford. Thankfully, I can enjoy the story on DVD as well as Britbox and I’ve purchased the four-part story via Google Play. 🙂
Sadly, the ‘An Unearthly Child’ dispute has had a knock-on effect on ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’, as demonstrated in the BBC Four repeat we’ve had lately. I was checking out a bit of ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’ on TV after watching ‘The Daleks in Colour’ on the 23rd of November.
I regard ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’ highly. I enjoyed watching it on Britbox earlier this year in March. So, it’s sad when checking out ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’ on BBC TV recently, noticeable cuts were made in the 2023 TV edit, specifically in scenes related to ‘An Unearthly Child’.
In the scenes where the actors are recording scenes as their characters in ‘An Unearthly Child’, the moments where they say the dialogue from the scripts are cut from the edit. This is clearly to avoid any copyright infringement due to the ongoing dispute between the BBC and Anthony Coburn’s son.
Realising what was happening, I stopped watching the 2023 edit of ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’. I appreciate the difficulties the BBC are going through concerning the dispute, but I found it easier to enjoy the original 2013 edit of ‘Adventure’ on Britbox and not the 2023 edit on BBC Four. 😐
Mind you, had I watched the rest of the 2023 edit of ‘Adventure’ on BBC Four, I would have been surprised to find a change had been made in the closing moments of the docu-drama. Instead of David Bradley as William Hartnell looking up and seeing Matt Smith as the Doctor, he sees Ncuti Gatwa. 😀
Now this isn’t a major issue for me, since I get why the 2023 edit features Ncuti Gatwa instead of Matt Smith. Ncuti Gatwa is the latest actor to play the Doctor in ‘Doctor Who’, so it makes sense for him to be there for the 60th anniversary version of ‘Adventure’ and give us a teaser of what’s to come.
Although wouldn’t it have made sense to have David Tennant instead of Ncuti Gatwa in that final scene? David is the current Doctor at this time, and we haven’t got to Ncuti’s era on TV yet. Also, Peter Capaldi wasn’t in ‘Adventure’ and yet he was cast as the Doctor in August 2013 following Matt Smith.
No disrespect to Ncuti Gatwa, but I prefer the 2013 edit of ‘Adventure’ featuring Matt Smith rather than the 2023 edit. Simply because ‘Adventure’ was made for the 50th anniversary celebrations first. Whilst I appreciate the 2023 edit reflects current times, I don’t like the idea of replacing Matt Smith.
What I think could have worked better in the 2023 edit is to have Doctors like Christopher Eccleston, David Tennant, Matt Smith, Peter Capaldi, Jodie Whittaker and Ncuti Gatwa appearing at the same time to illustrate how far the TV series has come and how it’s progressed since it began in the 1960s.
Anyway, those are my current thoughts about ‘An Unearthly Child’ and ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’ in 2023. I don’t know how things will turn out for the BBC and whether they’ll get to repeat ‘An Unearthly Child’ on BBC iPlayer, but it’s fascinating to see Ncuti Gatwa appear in 2023’s ‘Adventure’.
Thanks for reading!
Bye for now!
Tim 🙂

I wonderful if changing the Doctor cameo at the end of An Adventure In Space And Time will become a thing for each anniversary. It’s not that we should feel compelled to embrace it. But it can at least make a point on how Hartnell’s legacy will be honoured by all those who created the role that he originally made so wonderful. Thank you, Tim.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi scifimike,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on Ncuti Gatwa’s cameo at the end of the 2023 edit of ‘An Adventure In Space and Time’. If the BBC are planning to update ‘Adventure’ with a cameo of the latest Doctor in ‘Doctor Who’ for the 70th anniversary in 2033, then that’s their prerogative. I’m just happy I can enjoy the original 2013 version of the docudrama with Matt Smith appearing at the end and with all the ‘An Unearthly Child’ dialogue scenes intact on DVD and Britbox without needing to check out the 2023 edit on BBC iPlayer. Whilst I prefer the 2004 version of the original ‘Star Wars’ trilogy, I appreciate ‘Star Wars’ fans being frustrated with updates being made to the original film trilogy over the years, since they grew up with the original versions from 1977 to 1983, just like I grew up with the 2013 version of ‘Adventure’ and I don’t see the need for it to be updated with Ncuti Gatwa instead of Matt Smith.
Many thanks for your comments.
Tim 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
The new visual tech for TV and cinema in this era can be an addiction for the powers that be. I miss the original cut for the first Star Wars trilogy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks scifimike,
I’ve not seen the original version of the original ‘Star Wars’ trilogy myself, but I’ve seen comparison clips, including of what Jabba the Hutt looked like when Han Solo met up with him and there was no Boba Fett with Jabba. It was very surreal to see. 😀
Tim 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some CGI remasterings I can agree with like for the classic Star Trek, THX 1138 and the correction tweaks that Ridley Scott had made to Blade Runner. When it comes to classic Doctor Who, a few that I’ve seen thanks to DVDs, like Day Of The Daleks, have been most agreeable. But like many fans I’m concerned that in the new Blu-Ray editions they might be taking it a bit too far.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi scifimike,
I actually like some of the CGI effects options in the classic series Blu-ray box sets of ‘Doctor Who’. I’ve just finished enjoyed the CGI effects of ‘Logopolis’ on Blu-ray. I’m looking forward to checking out the 40th anniversary edition of ‘The Five Doctors’ soon in the Season 20 Blu-ray box set.
Best wishes,
Tim 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
From what I’ve seen from the promo for the new Time Scoop effects, I’m sure that can be interesting. The shot of seeing the 4th Doctor actually fall in the Logopolis promo is (just my opinion of course) a bit defeating of the original shot of the Doctor’s hand just letting go and then shifting to the companions’ reaction. I can certainly always respect the subjective viewpoints of fans. Because I easily have my own too. But I suppose the most original impacts for fans during the classic eras can influence our judgements for the most part.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi scifimike,
From watching the Blu-ray CGI effects version of ‘Logopolis’, I prefer the newer version of the Doctor falling and the companions reacting to it compared to the original on DVD, as I feel it’s more effective to see the Doctor falling than not at all in the original. But that’s my opinion, as I’m sure there are many who prefer the original version of the Doctor falling more than the new version on Blu-ray.
Many thanks,
Tim 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person